NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Rooty Hill RSL Club Limited v Liquor Administration Board of New South Wales [2005] NSWSC 1140
HEARING DATE(S) : 14 April 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 10 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Johnson J at 1
DECISION : Summons dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : GAMING - possession and operation of gaming machines by registered club - conditional authority to possess and operate gaming machines under hardship provisions in s.88AF Registered Clubs Act 1976 - repeal of s.88AF and commencement of Gaming Machines Act 2001 - operation of savings and transitional provisions in Gaming Machines Act 2001 - whether Liquor Administration Board has power to review and reduce number of gaming machines allowed under original s.88AF conditional authority - Board has such power
Gaming Machines Act 2001 Registered Clubs Act 1976 Unlawful Gambling Act 1998 LEGISLATION CITED : Gambling Legislation Amendment (Gaming Machine Restriction) Act 2000 Liquor Act 1982 Interpretation Act 1987 Gaming Machines Further Amendment Act No. 102 of 2002
Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 R v Young (1999) 46 NSWLR 681 Fisher v Hebburn Limited (1960) 105 CLR 188 Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261 Mathieson v Burton (1971) 124 CLR 1 Parkes Rural Distributors v Glasson (1986) 7 NSWLR 332 CASES CITED : Australian Capital Territory v Pinter (2002) 121 FCR 592 Wilkie v Attorney-General for NSW (Supreme Court of NSW, Foster J, 9 December 1986, unreported, BC8600484) Penna v Liquor Administration Board [2001] NSWSC 681 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clark (2003) 57 NSWLR 113 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] 194 CLR 355 Fortbacon Pty Limited v Dickie (1995) 127 FLR 69
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate