NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Andreasen [2005] NSWSC 1157 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 8 - 10 June and 20 & 21 July 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 November 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : Judgment for plaintiff for damages for breach of contract.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS [105] – General contractual principles – Construction and interpretation of contracts – Implied terms – Generally – Principles to be applied – Necessity to give business efficacy to contract.
LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 47
Associated Alloys Pty Limited v ACN 001 452 106 Pty Limited (In liquidation) (2000) 202 CLR 588 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 Hospital Products Limited v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 CASES CITED : Peppers Hotel Management Pty Limited v Hotel Capital Partners Limited [2004] NSWCA 114 Upper Hunter District Council v Australian Chilling and Freezing Co Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 429 J W Carter & D J Harland, Contract Law in Australia (4th ed, 2002) [606]
Cantarella Bros Pty Limited (P) PARTIES : Maia Andreasen (D1) Juan Renshaw (D2)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2277/04
J W J Stevenson SC and E C Muston (P) COUNSEL : D J Fagan SC (Ds)
Deacons (P) SOLICITORS : TressCox (Ds)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate