NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 50 ACSR 153 (2004) 22 ACLC 1106
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ASIC v Tasman Investment Management Ltd [2004] NSWSC 651 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/07/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 July 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Corporations List JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Order appointing receiver to wind up scheme
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - managed investment schemes - scheme required to be registered not registered - acknowledgment by operator that scheme should be wound up - proposal by operator that operator be allowed to sell scheme property with accountant as agent - no other functionary proposed by operator to administer or superintend winding up - whether court should accede to operator's proposal - whether independent person should be appointed as receiver to wind up scheme LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss.601ED(5), 601EE, 708(10) Trustee Act 1925, s.27B Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Atlantic 3 Financial (Aust) Pty Ltd (2003) 47 ACSR 52 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Chase Capital Management Pty Ltd (2001) 36 ACSR 778 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commercial Nominees of Australia Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 240 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v IP Product Management Group Pty Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 343 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v McNamara (2002) 42 ACSR 488 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Pegasus Leveraged Options Group Pty Ltd (2002) 41 ACSR 561 CASES CITED : Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Takaran Pty Ltd (No 2) (2002) 43 ACSR 334 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Young (2003) 173 FLR 441 Bells Securities Pty Ltd v LPG Mourant [2002] QSC 156 Cook v Law [2003] FCA 966 Cumulus Wines Pty Ltd v Huntley Management Ltd [2004] NSWSC 609 Hamilton v Piggott Wood and Baker [2003] FCA 1055 Re Lawloan Mortgages Pty Ltd [2003] 2 QdR 200 Woods v Dodge [2003] FCA 1066 Australian Securities and Investments Commission - Plaintiff Tasman Investment Management Limited - First Defendant Longevity Management Systems Pty Limited - Second Defendant PARTIES : QV Mortgage Pty Limited - Third Defendant Queen Victoria Project Management Company Pty Limited - Fourth Defendant Colin Philip Warne - Fifth Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate