NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Wright v Ryan & Anor [2005] NSWCA 368
30 August 2005; 31 August 2005 HEARING DATE(S):
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 October 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 74; Hunt AJA at 78
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL - fresh evidence - additional evidence - requirements for in appeal from conviction for contempt of Court - EVIDENCE - circumstantial - repetitive conduct - EVIDENCE - fresh evidence - additional evidence - requirements for in appeal from conviction for contempt of Court - ND
LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Act 1970
Barrett v Echo Personnel Pty Ltd (24 November 1998, Court of Appeal, unreported) Craig v The King (1933) 49 CLR 429 Gallagher v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 392 Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 140 CLR 1 Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367 CASES CITED: Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367 McDonald v McDonald (1965) 113 CLR 529 Parsons v McCann (1954) 93 CLR 418 Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510 Wollongong Corporation v Cowan (1955) 93 CLR 435
Craig Wright (Appellant) Michael Ryan (First Respondent) PARTIES: DeMorgan Information Security Systems Pty Ltd (Second Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40819 of 2004
G K Burton SC (Appellant) Dr J G Renwick (First Respondent) COUNSEL: Submitting appearance (Second Respondent)
Michie Shehadie & Co (Appellant) SOLICITORS: McArdle Legal (First Respondent) Toomey Pegg Drevikovsky (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate