NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Irvine v Scaysbrook [2005] NSWSC 565
HEARING DATE(S) : 9 & 10/06/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 10 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF : White J
DECISION : Proceedings dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES - Plaintiff son and wife and defendant mother and stepfather - Plaintiffs claim that property owned by defendants is held on trust - Property purchased by defendants leased to plaintiffs - Allegation by plaintiffs that monthly payments to defendants were on account of mortgage not rent - Whether evidence supports the existence of an express trust - Whether there was a constructive trust based on the common intention of the parties - Whether there was detrimental reliance by the plaintiffs on such a common intention - Whether plaintiffs' expenditure on the property gave rise to an equitable charge - Held that the claims are not made out by the evidence.
Jurisdiction of Courts (Foreign Land) Act 1989 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Property Law Act 1974 (Qld)
Penn v Lord Baltimore (1750) 1 Ves Sen 444; 27 ER 1132 Baltimore Rochefoucald v Boustead (1897) 1 Ch 196 Grant v Edwards (1986) Ch 638 Green v Green (1989) 17 NSWLR 343 Parianos v Melluish (2003) 30 FLR 524 Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 CASES CITED : Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Morris v Morris [1982] 1 NSWLR 61 Pettitt v Pettitt (1970) AC 777 Charles Marshall Pty Limited v Grimsley (1956) 95 CLR 353 Calverley v Green 155 CLR 242 Bryson v Bryant 29 NSWLR 188 West v Mead (2003) NSWSC 161
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate