NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : CSR Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWSC 946 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/09/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J DECISION : Plaintiff entitled to order that defendant Council pay the withheld amount plus interest. Declarations on defendant's cross claim refused.
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Prerogative Writs and Orders - Whether defendant Council should be ordered to fulfil a duty under the Supreme Court Act 1970, s 65 - Council acquiring land by compulsory acquisition under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 - Valuer-General determining amount of compensation to be offered in an amount inclusive of GST - Plaintiff accepting the amount - Council withholding an amount as GST payable to Commissioner of Taxation - Commissioner ruling no taxable supply involved - Whether a defensive claim of unjust enrichment open to the Council - Whether Council entitled to declaratory relief under the Supreme Court Act 1970, s 75 that plaintiff obliged to issue a tax invoice - Commissioner not a party to the proceedings Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act Local Government Act 1993 Supreme Court Act LEGISLATION CITED : New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Real Property Act 1900 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Spencer v The Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418 Pebruk Nominees Pty Ltd v Woolworths (Victoria) Pty Ltd 2003 ATC 4932 Henty House Pty Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1953) 88 CLR 141 CASES CITED : Shaw v Director of Housing & State of Tasmania (No 2) (2001) 10 Tas R 1 Dixon v Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1985) 3 NSWLR 347 Guaranty Trust Co of New York v Hannay & Co [1915] 2 KB 536 Mason and Carter, Restitution Law in Australia, Butterworths, Sydney, 1995 PARTIES : CSR Ltd - Plaintiff Hornsby Shire Council - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4346/04 COUNSEL : Mr Bret Walker SC/ Mr R Beasley - Plaintiff Mr D B McGovern SC/ Mr R Lancaster - Defendant SOLICITORS : Minter Ellison Lawyers Abbott Tout Solicitors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate