NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Silver v Dome Resources NL [2005] NSWSC 265
HEARING DATE(S) : 3 and 10 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 10 March 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : Leave to withdraw admission in defence refused
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [99] - Supreme Court procedure - Practice under Supreme Court Rules - Admissions - Withdrawal - Absence of absolute right to withdraw - Discretionary considerations.
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 200B and 200G
Celestino v Celestino FCAFC unreported 16 August 1990 Coopers Brewery Ltd v Panfida Foods Ltd (1992) 26 NSWLR 738 Demasi v Linfox Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd NSWSC unreported 14 June 1995, McLelland CJ in Eq Drabsch v Switzerland General Insurance Co Ltd NSWSC unreported 16 October 1996, Santow J CASES CITED : Hutton v Meston [2004] WASCA 178 Jeans v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (2003) 204 ALR 327 McKenzie v Commonwealth [2001] VSC 361 The State of Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Limited (1997) 189 CLR 146
Michael Bernard Silver (P1 & XD1) Fair Choice Limited (P2 & XD2) PARTIES : Dome Resources NL (D1 & XC1) Durban Roodepoort Deep Limited (D2 x XC2)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2586/01
J E Thomson & M J Watts (Ps & XDs) COUNSEL : T G R Parker (Ds & XCs)
Bull, Son & Schmidt (Ps & XDs) SOLICITORS : Allens Arthur Robinson (Ds & XCs)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate