NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Jason Andrew DOWD [2005] NSWCCA 113
HEARING DATE(S): 31 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 6 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Hoeben J at 61; Johnson J at 62
DECISION: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Appeal dismissed.
Attorney General's Application under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; R v Armstrong [2000] NSWCCA 94; R v Elachi [2003] NSWCCA 24; R v Finn [2002] NSWCCA 86; R v Hanslow [2004] NSWCCA 163; R v Johnstone [2004] NSWCCA 307; R v Newman [2004] NSWCCA 113; CASES CITED: R v Ramirez [1999] NSWCCA 406; R v Scott [2003] NSWCCA 286; R v Spiridonov (CCA, 1 May 1998, unreported); R v Stevens [2000] NSWCCA 324; R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; R v Tomich (2002) 127 A Crim R 234; R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343.
PARTIES: Regina v Jason Andrew DOWD
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/3172
D Woodburne - Crown COUNSEL: R Hulme SC - Applicant
S Kavanagh - Crown SOLICITORS: S E O'Connor - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 04/11/0065
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Ainslie Wallace DCJ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 2004/3172 DC 04/11/0065
GILES JA HOEBEN J JOHNSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate