NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hedderman v Murray & Anor [2005] NSWSC 262
HEARING DATE(S) : 30/03/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1
DECISION : I dismiss the summons. I order the plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs. The Exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Power to amend plans and approve an alternative site: s 40(3) of Liquor Act 1982. - Nature of statutory appeal - the ambit of "question of Law"
Liquor Act 1982 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970
Cowley & Ors v Smith & Anor; Poulos v Smith & Anor (unreported 23 December 2003 per Whealy J Kupke & Anor v Martin (1998) 13 NSWLR 449 Willoughby Municipal Council v Local Government Appeals Tribunal & Anor (1974) 2 NSWLR 415 at 42F Legge v Inner London Education Authority (1972) 1 WLR 1245 at 1256 Qantas Airways Limited v Arabco Limited (1996) 185 CLR 43 at 61 Transport Action Group Against Motorways v RTA (1999) 46 NSWLR 598 at 647 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex Parte Applicant s 20/2002 (2003) 77 ALJR 1165 at 52, 37, 173; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB (2004) 78 ALJR 992 at 38 Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW) v Bragg (2003] NSWCA 388 (22 December 2004) at 57-66 Woolworths Limited v Pallas Newco Pty Limited [2004] NSWCA 422 (19 November 2004 at 92 Murrumbidgee Groundwater Preservation Association Inc v Minister for Natural Resources [2005] NSWCA 10 (19 February 2005) at 129 Hill v Green (1999) 48 NSWLR 161 at 174-175 Australian Gaslight Co v Valuer General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Waterford v The Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54 Azzopardi v Tasman UED Industries Limited (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 at 155-7 Mahony v Industrial Registrar of New South Wales (1986) 8 NSWLR 1 at 5 CASES CITED : Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 at 355 AG (NSW) v X (2000) 49 NSWLR 653 Colonial Bank of Austtralasia v Willan (1874) 5 PC 417 at 443 Ex Parte Tees Limited re Butler (1934) 34 SR (NSW) 277 at 283 Ex Parte Mullen re Hood (1935) 35 SR (NSW) 289 at 298 Minahan v Baldock (1950) 84 CLR 1 at 11 Ex Parte Hulin; re Gillespie (1965) 65 SR (NSW) 31 at 33 Parissienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1937) 59 CLR 369 Manning v Thompson (1976) 2 NSWLR 380; (1979) 1 NSWLR 384 Ex Parte Cuneo & Ors Re Latham (1956) SR (NSW) 197 Cuneo v Latham (1956) 30 ALJR 179 Cross v McHugh (1974) 1 NSWLR 500 at 503 Bradley v Fitzmaurice (1974) 2 NSWLR 286 per Jeffrey J Bean v Dukic (unreported NSWCA per Gleeson CJ, Beazley, Stein JJA 5 December 1997) Raffaele v Sidaway (unreported NSWSC Sully J 16 May 1997) Murphy v Brittain (unreported NSWSC Barr J 8 November 1996) Gorczynski v Perera & Anor (2003) NSWCA 70 per Santow JA with whom Meagher and Ipp JJA agreed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate