NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Coordinated Construction Co v J M Hargreaves & Ors [2005] NSWSC 77
HEARING DATE(S) : 3 February 2005, 9 February 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1
DECISION : See para [63] of judgment
CATCHWORDS : BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION - progress payment - adjudicator's determination - basic and essential requirements of a valid determination - whether determination void because adjudicated amount included amounts assumed (but not decided) not to be "for" construction work - whether determination in breach of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 is unlawful - whether payment claim served on or from reference date
LEGISLATION CITED : Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999
Brodyn Pty Ltd v Davenport [2004] NSWCA 394 De Martin & Gasparini v Energy Australia [2002] NSWCA 330 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 CASES CITED : Kembla Coal & Coke v Select Civil [2004] NSWSC 628 Quasar Constructions v Demtech Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 116 Rothnere v Quasar [2004] NSWSC 1151 TransGrid v Siemens Ltd [2004] NSWCA 395
Coordinated Construction Co Pty Limited (Plaintiff) J M Hargreaves (NSW) Pty Limited (First Defendant) PARTIES : John Parnell (Second Defendant) Peter Sarlos (Third Defendant) LEADR (Fourth Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55086/04
M G Rudge SC/M Christie (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : D D Feller SC/D Loewenstein (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate