NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 68 NSWLR 229 (2006) NSW ConvR 56-159
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: McGrath & Anor v Campbell & Anor [2006] NSWCA 180
HEARING DATE(S): 15/6/06
JUDGMENT DATE: 7 July 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Tobias JA at 6
DECISION: a) Appeal allowed; b) Set aside the declaration and orders made by Barrett J on 29 June 2005; c) The proceedings be dismissed; d) The respondents pay the appellants' costs of the proceedings at first instance and of the appeal but to have with respect to the latter a certificate under the Suitor's Fund Act 1951, if otherwise qualified
CATCHWORDS: EQUITY – equitable estates and interests – easement – implied easement created by Wheeldon v Burrows extended by Aldridge v Wright – effect of transfer of title under the Real Property Act 1900 – simultaneous transfers of title from a single vendor to separate purchasers – whether easement enforceable against successors in title – whether personal equity or right enforceable in personam exists between purchasers – REAL PROPERTY – easements – Torrens Title land – equitable easement – simultaneous transfer of tenements to different parties – whether equitable Wheeldon v Burrows easement can survive transfer to vendor's successor in title – effect of registration under Real Property Act 1900
Conveyancing Act 1919 LEGISLATION CITED: Land Transfer Act 1952 (NZ) Real Property Act 1900, s 42 Suitor's Fund Act 1951
Aldridge v Wright [1929] 2 KB 117 Australian Hi-Fi Publications Pty Ltd v Gehl [1979] 2 NSWLR 618 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 604 Breskvar v Wall (1971) 126 CLR 376 British Leyland Motor Corporation Ltd v Armstrong Patents Co Ltd [1986] AC 577 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Green Cartridge Co (Hong Kong) Ltd [1997] AC 728 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 Crook v Hill LR 6 Ch 311 Dobbie v Davidson (1991) 23 NSWLR 625 Douglas v Baynes (1908) AC 477 Frazer v Walker [1967] 1 AC 569 Grgic v Australian & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1994) 33 NSWLR 202 Hamlyn v. Wood [1891] 2 QB 488 Hansford v Jago [1921] 1 Ch 322 CASES CITED: Horsfall v Braye (1908) 7 CLR 629 Howitt v Fitzgerald (1898) 24 VLR 287 Kebewar Pty Ltd v Harkin (1987) 9 NSWLR 738 Maralinga Pty Ltd v Major Enterprises Pty Ltd (1973) 128 CLR 336 Mayer v Coe [1968] 2 NSWR 747 Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance Co Ltd v Gosper (1991) 25 NSWLR 32 Nelson v Walker (1910) 10 CLR 560 Pwllbach Colliery Co v Woodman [1915] AC 634 Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1979] AC 144 Story v Advance Bank Australia Ltd (1993) 31 NSWLR 722 Tarrant v Zandstra (1973) 1 BPR 9381 Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 Ch D 31 Vassos v State Bank of South Australia [1992] V Conv R 54- 443 Wilcox v Richardson (1997) 43 NSWLR 4 Wilkinson v Adam 1 V&B 422 Williams v State Transit Authority (2004) 60 NSWLR 286
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate