NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Suzanne Frugtniet v Administrative Decisions Tribunal (Appeal Panel) & Anor; Brian Frugtniet v Administrative Decisions Tribunal (Appeal Panel) & Anor [2005] NSWCA 257
HEARING DATE(S): 14 June 2005; 15 June 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 August 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Ipp JA at 51; McColl JA at 52
DECISION: Appeals dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - merits review - compliance with jurisdictional requirements - Travel Agents Act 1986 - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - merits review - based on evidence before Tribunal - ND
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Act 1970 Travel Agents Act 1986
Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Commissioner of Police v Tanos (1958) 98 CLR 383 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 CASES CITED: Rich v Australian Securities & Investments Commission (2004) 78 ALJR 1354 Russell v Duke of Norfolk [1949] 1 All ER 109 Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Darling Harbour Authority (1991) 24 NSWLR 156
CA 40386 of 2004 Suzanne Frugtniet (Appellant) Administrative Decisions Tribunal (Appeal Panel) (First Respondent) Commissioner for Fair Trading (Second Respondent)
PARTIES: CA 40387 of 2004 Brian Frugtniet (Appellant) Administrative Decisions Tribunal (Appeal Panel) (First Respondent) Commissioner for Fair Trading (Second Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40386 of 2004; CA 40387 of 2004
A W Street SC (Appellant) COUNSEL: N/A (First Respondent) N Williams SC/G Elliott (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate