NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Jebeli v Modir and Golyaei [2005] NSWCA 184
HEARING DATE(S): 12 May 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Tobias JA at 2; McColl JA at 83
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS: TRADE PRACTICES - Fair Trading - Misleading or deceptive conduct - Representation by mortgage broker to purchaser that price of unit was "off the plan" price - Whether representation in "trade or commerce" - Whether purchaser relied on representation - Reasonableness of reliance - Whether purchaser suffered damage as a result of reliance - Fair Trading Act 1987 ss 42, 68 - NEGLIGENCE - Negligent misrepresentation - Whether mortgage broker's conduct in breach of duty of care to purchaser - EVIDENCE - Appeals - Fresh evidence - Evidence of attempt by party to suborn witness - Whether evidence should be admitted on appeal as fresh evidence - Whether high degree of probability that evidence would have produced different finding at trial - Whether evidence an admission of party having a bad case - Supreme Court Act 1970 s 75A(7), (8) - EVIDENCE - Illegally obtained evidence - Party tape-recorded conversation without knowledge or consent of other party - Whether evidence should have been admitted - Gravity of contravention - Whether contravention deliberate or reckless - DAMAGES - Correct measure where misleading conduct induces party to enter contract of purchase
Fair Trading Act 1987 Listening Devices Act 1984 LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 Supreme Court Act 1970 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 Plimer v Roberts (1997) 80 FCR 303 Shaddock and Associates Pty Limited v Parramatta County Council (No 1) (1981) 150 CLR 225 Esanda Finance Corporation Limited v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997) 188 CLR 241 O'Brien v Smolonogov (1983) 53 ALR 107 Argy v Blunts & Lane Cover Real Estate Pty Limited (1990) 94 ALR 719 Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155 CASES CITED: Moriarty v London Chatham Railway Company (1870) LR 5 QB 314 See v Hardman [2002] NSWSC 234 Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Limited (1986) 160 CLR 1 Sydney Harbour Casino Properties Pty Limited v Coluzzi [2002] ANZ ConvR 253 HTW Valuers (Central Qld) Pty Limited v Astonland Pty Limited (2004) 211 ALR 79 Thompson v Henderson & Partners (1990) 58 SASR 548
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate