NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Civil Aviation Safety Authority v Sydney Heli-Scenic Pty Limited [2006] NSWCA 111
HEARING DATE(S): 17 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; McColl JA at 84
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACT – Whether compromise agreement gave rise to contractual obligations enforceable by the Court – Capacity of Civil Aviation Safety Authority to bind itself in contract – whether agreement unenforceable as a fetter on CASA's statutory discretion.
LEGISLATION CITED: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1988 (Cth) s26; s42C, s42D Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth) s3A, s9A, s13; s28, s28BA, s28BB, s31,s32
Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1997) 139 CLR 54 CASES CITED: Australian Woollen Mills Pty Limited v The Commonwealth (1954) 92 CLR 424 South Australia v The Commonwealth (1962) 108 CLR 130
PARTIES: CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY (Appellant) SYDNEY HELI-SCENIC PTY LIMITED (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40573/05
COUNSEL: D F JACKSON, QC/ I L HARVEY (Appellant) B W WALKER, SC/ R J BRENDER (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Blake Dawson Waldron (Appellant) McLaughlin Riordan (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 2584/02
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: S Walmsley SC DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 06/10/2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40573/05 DC 2584/02
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate