NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Rivera v Health Care Complaints Commission [2006] NSWCA 216 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 31 January 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 August 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Santow JA at 2; McColl JA at 3
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: MEDICINE - medical practitioners - whether Medical Tribunal erred in law in finding patient's complaints proved to requisite standard of proof - whether conduct proved properly characterised as professional misconduct - EVIDENCE - effect on patient's general credibility of rejection of her evidence in respect of one complaint - use of similar fact evidence to assist conclusion second complaint established - APPEAL - error of law - challenge to Tribunal's reasoning process.(D)
LEGISLATION CITED: Medical Practice Act 1992 Supreme Court Act 1970
Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Citicorp Life Insurance Ltd v Smith [2005] FCAFC 102 Daskalopoulos v HCC [2002] NSWCA 200 Health Care Complaints Commission v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 630 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 CASES CITED: Jones v Dunkel [1959] HAC 8; 101 CLR 298 Lindsay v Health Care Complaints Commission [2005] NSWCA 356 Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act v Deerubbin LALC (1998) 43 NSWLR 249 Purnell v Medical Board of Queensland [1999] 1 Qd R 362 R v District Court of the Metropolitan District Holden at Sydney; Ex parte White (1966) 116 CLR 644 Sabag v Health Care Complaints Commission [2001] NSWCA 411 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Limited (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Zaidi v Health Care Complaints Commission (1998) 44 NSWLR 82
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate