NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Batty v Batty [2004] NSWSC 904 HEARING DATE(S) : 19, 20 and 21 April 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 September 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity division JUDGMENT OF : Master McLaughlin at 1 DECISION : (1). I order that the summons be dismissed.; (2). I order that all earlier costs orders made herein be vacated. ; (3). I make no order as to costs, to the intent that each party bear her or his own costs of the proceedings. ; (4). The exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Succession. - Family Provision. - Claim by adult granddaughter. - Substantial legacy given to Plaintiff by will. - Whether Plaintiff is an eligible person. - Whether Plaintiff was dependent upon Deceased. - Relationship between Plaintiff and Deceased. - Statements by Deceased. - Factors warranting the making of the application. - Financial and material circumstances of Plaintiff. - Whether Plaintiff has been left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance.- Competing claim of Defendant. LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 (New South Wales) Testator's Family Maintenance and Guardianship of Infants Act 1916 (New South Wales) Ball v Newey (1988) 13 NSWLR 489 CASES CITED : Blore v Lang (1960) 104 CLR 124 Re Fulop Deceased (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 PARTIES : Joanne Leslie Batty (Plaintiff) Brett Denis Batty (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2022 of 2002 COUNSEL : Plaintiff in person Mr. G. E. Underwood (Defendant) SOLICITORS : David Kennedy, Esq (Defendant)
- 3 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate