NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 154 A Crim R 173
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Commonwealth DPP v Xu [2005] NSWSC 191
HEARING DATE(S) : 10/03/2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 March 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Hoeben J at 1
DECISION : Defendant's motion dismissed. Order made in accordance with plaintiff's application.
CATCHWORDS : Privilege against self-incrimination, order requiring statement of assets and liabilities, abrogation of privilege by implication contested with need for express language.
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Code Act 1995 (C'th) LEGISLATION CITED : Customs Act 1901 (C'th) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (C'th)
ASIC v Michalik [2004] NSWSC 909 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Cox (1986) 70 ALR 509 Control Consultants v Corporate Affairs Commissioner (1985) 59 ALJR 254 DPP v Logan Park Investments Pty Limited (1995) 37 NSWLR 118 Jeffrey v DPP (1995) 79 ACrimR 514 Police Service Board v Morris (1985) 58 ALR 1 CASES CITED : Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Mortimer v Brown (1970) 122 CLR 493 Pyneboard Proprietary Limited v Trade Practices Commission & Anor (1983) 152 CLR 328 Reid v Howard (1995) 184 CLR 1 Sorby v The Commonwealth (1983) 152 CLR 281 The Queen v Director of Serious Fraud Office (1993) AC 1 at 40
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions- Plaintiff PARTIES : Cui Mian Xu - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10326/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate