NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 65 NSWLR 245
New South Wales Court of Appeal
Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee [2005] NSWCA 456 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 28 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Handley JA at 19; Tobias JA at 25
DECISION: (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Set aside the decision of the Appeal Panel of 10 January 2005; (3) In lieu thereof remit the proceedings in ADT Appeal Panel No 049044 of 2004 for rehearing in conformity with the decision of this Court; (4) Costs in this Court reserved; (5) Costs of the earlier proceedings in the Appeal Panel to abide the order of the Appeal Panel hearing the remitted proceedings; (6) Direct the appellant to file and serve any written submissions he wishes to make with respect to any question of costs on or before 24 January 2006, the respondent to file and serve any submissions in reply on or before 3 February 2006 on the basis that all questions of costs will be determined by the Court upon the papers
CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Administrative Decisions Tribunal – Appeal Panel – Disciplinary proceedings – Whether appellant's right of appeal from Tribunal to Appeal Panel extended to merits review – Whether appellant denied procedural fairness – STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION – Whether extension of appeal to merits review under s 113(2)(b) of Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act dependant upon appeal raising question of law – Proper construction of transitional provisions in ADT Act – Purposive construction to avoid lacuna or gap in legislative scheme – Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986 s 34 – Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 ss 112, 113, 119, 120, cl 37 Sch 5
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate