NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : IBRAHIM & ORS v PHAM & ORS [2004] NSWSC 661 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 July 2004 - JUDGMENT DATE : 20 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J DECISION : Objection overruled. Evidence admitted.
CATCHWORDS : Expert evidence - report - exposure of bases for opinion LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 ss79 & 80 Australian Securities Investments Commission v Vines [2003] NSWSC 1095 CASES CITED : Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sproules (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 O'Brien v Gillespie (1996) 41 NSWLR 569 Rabelais Pty Ltd v Cameron (unreported, NSWSC, 8 February 1993) RIMA IBRAHIM (First plaintiff)
SARGON NAJORIAN BADAL (Second plaintiff)
BADAL INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (Third plaintiff)
v
PHILIP PHAM (First defendant) PARTIES : PHAM ATIC PTY LTD (Second defendant)
FRED DAVID (Third defendant)
SUZIE DAVID (Fourth defendant)
PAUL MANUELPILLA DOMINIC (Sixth defendant)
LINDA JOAN GLORIA ROMANO (Seventh defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20483 OF 2002 B H K Donovan QC / D Baran (Plaintiffs)
D Pritchard COUNSEL : (First and second defendants)
R Darke SC / M Dicker (Third to sixth defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate