NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Guderjahn v Matilda Cruises Pty Limited & 1 Or; Matilda Cruises Pty Limited v Ledden [2006] NSWCA 107
HEARING DATE(S): 24/04/06
JUDGMENT DATE: 30 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Ipp JA at 1; Tobias JA at 63; Basten JA at 78
DECISION: (1) The appeal by Mr Guderjahn on the apportionment of liability is allowed (2) The order made by her Honour apportioning liability between Mr Guderjahn and Matilda Cruises is set aside (3) Liability between Mr Guderjahn and Matilda Cruises should be apportioned equally (4) Matilda Cruises to pay the costs of Mr Guderjahn's appeal in relation to the apportionment of liability but to have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act 1951 (NSW) if otherwise qualified (5) The appeal of Mr Guderjahn and Matilda Cruises against the assessment of damages is dismissed (6) Mr Guderjahn and Matilda Cruises to pay Mr Ledden the costs of the appeal in relation to the assessment of damages.
CATCHWORDS: NEGLIGENCE - collision between a ferry and a dinghy in Sydney Harbour - passenger on dinghy seriously injured - apportionment of liability between the operator of the dinghy and the ferry master - both ferry and dinghy on incorrect side of navigation channel when the collision occurred - failure to keep a proper lookout. - DAMAGES - whether the assessment by the trial judge was reasonable. ND
LEGISLATION CITED: Navigation (Collision) Regulations 1983 (NSW), r 15
CASES CITED: Dwight v Bouchier (2003) 37 MVR 550
CA 40365/05 Ralph Guderjahn (Appellant) Matilda Cruises Pty Limited (First Respondent) PARTIES: Clint Ledden (Second Respondent) CA 40356/05 Matilda Cruises Pty Limited (Appellant) Clint Ledden (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate