NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Saric v Steward [2005] NSWSC 43
HEARING DATE(S) : 27, 28 and 29 September, 12 October 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 10 February 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Master McLaughlin at 1
DECISION : (1). I order that the proceedings be stood over to a date to be fixed by arrangement with my Associate, for the bringing in of short minutes and, if desired, for argument as to costs.
CATCHWORDS : Family Law. De facto relationship. Date of termination of relationship. Duration of relationship. Three separate periods of cohabitation. Significant periods of separation. Whether the parties have lived together in the relationship for not less than two years. Child of the parties. Respective contributions of the parties. Domestic relationship agreement. Significance of agreement where by its terms its provisions are no longer in force.
Family Law Act 1975 (Commonwealth) LEGISLATION CITED : Property (Relationships) Act 1984
Black v Black (1991) 15 FamLR 109 Davey v Lee (1990) 13 FamLR 688 Evans v Marmont (1997) 42 NSWLR 70 Green v Robertson (1995) 36 NSWLR 96 Jones v Grech [2001] NSWCA 208 CASES CITED : Mathieson v Wallis [2001] NSWSC 931 Nguyen v Schieff (2002) 29 FamLR 177 Roy v Sturgeon (1986) 11 NSWLR 454 Sullman v Sullman [2002] NSWSC 169 Wallace v Stanford (1995) 37 NSWLR 1 Wallis v Mathieson [2002] NSWCA 350
Maya Saric (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Jason Bruce Steward (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4909 of 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate