NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2005) DFC 95-320
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Poulos v Svoboda [2005] NSWSC 364
HEARING DATE(S) : 18/04/05 and 19/04/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 May 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Master Macready
DECISION : See para 71 and 72
CATCHWORDS : Equity - specific performance - whether agreement entered into as a result of economic duress - whether plaintiff ready, willing and able to perform agreement for purchase - specific performance refused. - Family law - application under Property (Relationships) Act 1984 for adjustment of parties property interests - consideration of classification of funds provided by parents of a party - orders for adjustment.
Contracts Review Act LEGISLATION CITED : Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Property (Relationships) Act 1984
Cockerill v Westpac Banking Corporation (1996) 142 ALR 227 Codelfa Constructions Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW [1981-1982] 149 CLR 347 Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Crescendo Management Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1998) 19 NSWLR 40 CASES CITED : Green v Sommerville (1979) 141 CLR 594 In the Marriage of Gosper (1987) 90 FLR 1 In the Marriage of Kessey v Kessey (1994) 18 FLR 149 Mehmet v Benson (1964) 113 CLR 295 Norbis v Norbis (1985-1986) 161 CLR 513
PARTIES : Philip Con Poulos v Petra Svoboda
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1172/2003
Miss E Cohen for plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr W. Washington for defendant
Hilton Lawyers for plaintiff SOLICITORS : Shana Radnan & Co for defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate