NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Minister for Commerce v Contrax Plumbing & Ors [2004] NSWSC 823 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 August 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1 DECISION : See paras [72] and [73] of judgment
CATCHWORDS : BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION - Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) - whether adjudication determination should be quashed - whether adjudicator erred in law in his construction of s 34 of the Act - whether adjudicator failed to determine defendant's entitlement in accordance with the terms of the contract - whether adjudicator erred in reaching his determination on a basis not advanced by defendant in its payment claim and therefore not considered by plaintiff in its payment schedule - whether adjudicator committed jurisdictional error by determining the adjudication application on basis of arguments advanced by defendant for first time in that application - whether adjudicator committed jurisdictional error by not considering the plaintiff's response to matters advanced by defendant for the first time in its adjudication application - whether relief should be withheld on discretionary grounds Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Amendment Act 2002 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) John Holland Pty Limited v Cardno MBK (NSW) Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 258 Abacus v Davenport (2003) NSWSC 1027 Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd v Luikens and Anor [2003] NSWSC 1140 CASES CITED : TransGrid v Walter Construction Group [2004] NSWSC 21 Jemzone v Trytan [2002] NSWSC 395 Quasar Constructions v Demtech Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 116 Brodyn Pty Ltd v Davenport & Anor [2003] NSWSC 1019 The Minister for Commerce (formerly Public Works and Services) (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Contrax Plumbing (NSW) Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia (Second Defendant) Peter Loveday (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55052/04 COUNSEL : M A Pembroke SC/F P Hicks (Plaintiff) F C Corsaro SC/J Young (First Defendant) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Colin Biggers & Paisley (First Defendant) Gadens (Second Defendant) Minter Ellison (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate