NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) Aust Contract Reports 90-245
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Stuart Pty Limited v Condor Commercial Insulation Pty Limited [2006] NSWCA 334
HEARING DATE(S): 19 & 20 June 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 November 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Ipp JA at 107; Tobias JA at 124
DECISION: 1. Appeal dismissed; 2. Direct that the parties are to provide written submissions in respect of costs within seven days of the date of judgment.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACTS – appellant sub-contracted insulation work to respondent – breach of sub-contract by respondent – head contract terminated as a result – whether respondent liable for appellant's loss of profits on head contract - REMOTENESS – second limb of Hadley v Baxendale – whether loss within reasonable contemplation of parties – whether respondent knew of special circumstances such that it would be within reasonable contemplation that breach of contract would cause loss – head contract as special circumstance - REMOTENESS – second limb of Hadley v Baxendale – whether event giving rise to loss (a fire due to faulty workmanship) was not unlikely to occur REMOTENESS – knowledge of special circumstances – whether appellant responsible for supervising works – contract price out of all proportion with risk of being liable for enhanced damages
Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Limited (1987) 9 NSWLR 310 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344 Burns v M.A.N. Automotive (Aust) Pty Limited (1986) 161 CLR 653 C Czarnikow Ltd v Koufos [1969] 1 AC 350 Carter and Harland, Contract Law in Australia (2002, 4th ed) Castle Constructions Pty Limited v Fekala Pty Limited [2006] NSWCA 133 Florida Hotels Pty Limited v Mayo (1965) 113 CLR 591 Greig and Davis, The Law of Contract (1987) CASES CITED: Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341 Monarch Steamship Co Limited v Karlshamns Oljefabriker (A/B) [1949] AC 196 Oxley County Council v Macdonald & Ors; Brambles Holdings Ltd v Macdonald & Ors [1999] NSWCA 126 R & H Hall Ltd v WH Pim (Junior) & Co Ltd (1928) 33 Com Cas 324; [1928] All ER 763 Robophone Facilities Ltd v Blank [1966] 1 WLR 1428 Seven Seas Properties Ltd v Al-Essa (No 2) [1993] 1 WLR 1083 Simonius Vischer v Holt & Thompson [1979] 2 NSWLR 322 The Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Limited (1991) 174 CLR 64 Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528 Wenham v Ella (1972) 127 CLR 454
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate