NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Stockland (Constructors) Pty Limited v Darryl I Coombs Pty Limited & Ors [2004] NSWSC 894 HEARING DATE(S) : 24/09/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 September 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Technology and Construction List JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Answer given to 5 separate questions. Proceedings to be remitted to Referee for clarification/reconsideration of the ambit of fees properly allowable to the joint venture in light of his findings or varied findings following the remitter.
CATCHWORDS : Part 72 - Adoption of Referee's report - Motions dealt with by separate question orders under Part 31 Supreme Court Rules LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules (NSW) 1970 ABB Engineering Construction Pty Limited v Abigroup Contractors Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 665 Abigroup Contractors Pty Limited v Peninsula Balmain Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 752 Allied Constructions Pty Ltd v Hyder Consulting (Aust) Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 808 Antaios Compania Naviera SA v Salen Rederierna AB [1985] AC 191 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Assn (1973) 129 CLR 99 Biscayne Partners Pty Limited v Valance Corporation Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 874 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council [2001] NSWCA 105 Carter v Hyde (1923) 33 CLR 115 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 CASES CITED : Di Biase v Rezek (1971) 1 NSWLR 735 Hide & Skin Trading Pty Ltd v Oceanic Meat Traders Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 310 International Fina Services AG v Katrina Shipping Ltd ("The Fina Samco") [1995] 2 Lloyds Rep 344 Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896; [1998] 1 All ER 98 L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd [1974] AC 235 Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 70 Peppers Hotel Management Pty Limited v Hotel Capital Partners Limited [2004] NSWCA 114 Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council [2002] HCA 5; (2002) 76 ALJR 436 Unity Insurance Brokers Pty Limited v Rocco Pezzano Pty Limited (1998) 192 CLR 603 Upper Hunter District Council v Australian Chilling and Freezing Co Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 429 Vodafone Pacific Ltd v Mobile Innovations Ltd [2004] NSWCA 15 Stockland (Constructors) Pty Limited ACN 000 064 835 (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Darryl I Coombs Pty Limited ACN 001 367 317 (First Defendant) Philip J Flook Pty Limited ACN 000 412 564 (Second Defendant) Retail Design Group (International) Pty Limited ACN 002 421 098 (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55046/99 Mr P Dodson (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr I G Roberts (First and Second Defendants) Ms E Ollson SC, Mr R Newell (Third Defendants) Cohen & Krass (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Minter Ellison (First and Second Defendants) Cunningham Legal (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate