NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Puglia v Basol & Ors [2005] NSWSC 1271
HEARING DATE(S) : 07/12/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 7 December 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Declaratory and other relief granted
CATCHWORDS : CONVEYANCING - whether alienation of property with intent to defraud creditors - appropriate form of orders
LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919, s.37A
Babanaft International Company v Bassatne [1990] Ch 13 Cannane v J Cannane Pty Ltd (1998) 192 CLR 557 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 300 CASES CITED : Commissioner of State Taxation v Mechold Pty Ltd (1995) 95 ATR 69 Electrical Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rogers (1988) 15 NSWLR 473 Langdon v Gruber [2001] NSWSC 276
Nina Puglia - Plaintiff Seyit Basol - First Defendant PARTIES : Inci Basol - Second Defendant Changing Seasons Florist Pty Limited - Third Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1958/05
Mr S.P.W. Glascott - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Second Defendant in Person
Crichton-Brownes - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Second Defendant in Person
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
WEDNESDAY 7 DECEMBER 2005
1958/05 NINA PUGLIA v SEYIT BASOL & ORS
JUDGMENT
1 The plaintiff seeks relief under s.37A(1) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 in respect of three transactions entered into by the first defendant. Section 37A is in the following terms: " Voluntary alienation to defraud creditors voidable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate