NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Haywood v Collaroy Services Beach Club [2005] NSWSC 1203
HEARING DATE(S) : 19 October 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 November 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Rothman J at 1
DECISION : (a) The Defendant answer interrogatories annexed hereto; (b) Otherwise the notice of motion of the plaintiff is dismissed; (c) Leave is granted for the plaintiff to file and serve a notice of motion, returnable before me, seeking the oral examination of Robert Bell; (d) The plaintiff shall pay the costs of the notice of motion, as taxed or agreed, together with any additional costs, over and above that which would have been incurred if all interrogatories had been served in one document, of answering these further interrogatories, such costs to be as taxed or agreed.
CATCHWORDS : Notice of Motion - Interrogatories - Where plaintiff seeks further and better answers - Rule 22 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules - Fairness and efficiency
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Act
Boyle v Downs [1979] 1 NSWLR 192 Schutt v Queenan [2000] NSWCA 341 CASES CITED : Chong v Nguyen [2005] NSWSC 588 Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146
Plaintiff - Anthony Neville HAYWOOD PARTIES : Defendant - Collaroy Services Beach Club
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20252/2001
P - Mr Gormly SC COUNSEL : D - Mr Maconachie SC
P - T D Kelly & Co SOLICITORS : D - Hunt & Hunt Lawyers
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
- 7 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate