NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Tripple Take Pty Limited v Clark Rubber Franchising Pty Limited; Robert Lloyd Brooks v Clark Rubber Franchising Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 1169
HEARING DATE(S) : 4/11/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 4 November 2005
Equity Division JURISDICTION : Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
DECISION : Motion for security for costs dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Security for costs - Delay in application
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Avner Pty Limited v Dimopoulos (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 12 February 1987, Young J, BC8701592) Buckley v Bennell (1974) 1 ACLR 301 Circaz Pty Limited v Manolidis (2003) 45 ACSR 542 CASES CITED : Idoport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank Limited [2001] NSWSC 744 Heath Group Australasia Pty Limited v Hanning [1999] NSWSC 719 KP Cable Investments Pty Limited v Meltglow Pty Limited (1995) 56 FCR 189 Smail v Burton [1975] VR 776
Tripple Take Pty Limited (Plaintiff 50020/04) PARTIES : Robert Lloyd Brooks (Plaintiff 50108/05) Clark Rubber Franchising Pty Limited (Defendant 50020/04, 50108/05)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50020/04; 50108/05
J Stevenson SC, R Bellamy (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : R Darke SC, B Shields (Defendant)
Slater & Gordon (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Deacons (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate