NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bar-Mordecai v UMP of NSW [2004] NSWSC 878 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 & 12 August 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 September 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The further amended statement of claim is dismissed ; (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Dismiss statement of claim Fair Trading Act 1987 - 42 LEGISLATION CITED : Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) - ss 13 & 14 Trades Practices Act 1974 (Cth) - s 52 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) - Part 13 r 5; Part 15 r 26 Bar-Mordecai v AMIL [2003] NSWSC 774 Bar-Mordecai v Hillston [2004] NSWCA 65 CASES CITED : Gibson v Parkes District Hospital (1991-92) 26 NSWLR 35 Henderson v Henderson [1843-60] All ER 378 Port Melbourne Aiuthority v Anshun Pty Limited (1981) 147 CLR 589 Michael Bar-Mordecai (Plaintiff) PARTIES : United Medical Protection of New South Wales (formerly NSW Medical Defence Union Limited) (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20325/2003 COUNSEL : Mr S D Kalfas (Defendant) Mr M Bar-Mordecai (Plaintiff in person)
SOLICITORS : Mr B Cuff & Mr D Brown, United Medical Protection (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
MASTER HARRISON
FRIDAY, 24 SEPTEMBER 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate