NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Hunters Hill Council v Peter Charles Cunningham, Valuer General of New South Wales & Ors [2005] NSWCA 185
HEARING DATE(S): 15 April 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 31 May 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Young CJ in Eq at 42; Stein AJA at 43
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: Compulsory acquisition of part of land - compensation - market value of acquired land - value of acquired and retained land less value of retained land - values to take account of highest and best use - whether valuation of retained land failed to do so - depends on facts. D
Brodyn Pty Ltd v Davenport [2004] NSWCA 394; Currey v Sutherland Shire Council (1998) 100 LGERA 365; Franklins Ltd v Penrith City Council [1999] NSWCA 134; Gosford City Council v Cunningham (CA, 29 April 1997, unreported); Gosford City Council v Valuer-General (1996) 90 LGERA 413; CASES CITED: Manly Council v Hortis (2001) 113 LGERA 321; Maurici v Chief Commissioner for State Revenue (2003) 212 CLR 111; Melwood Units Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Main Roads (1979) AC 426; The Minister v Matford Nominees Pty Ltd (1973) 2 NSWLR 58; Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu (1966) 185 CLR 259.
Hunters Hill Council - Appellant PARTIES: Peter Charles Cunningham, Valuer General of New South Wales - First Respondent Graham William Porter and Meredith Ruth Porter - Second Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40508/04
M Craig QC & P Clay - Appellant COUNSEL: J B Maston - First Respondent J Griffiths SC & R C Beasley - Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate