NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Shalhoub v Buchanan [2004] NSWSC 99 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/2/04 - 20/2/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 March 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J DECISION : Proceedings dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : TORTS - NEGLIGENCE - where economic or financial loss - allegations that defendant made statements at auction of land of the plaintiffs tending to discourage bidders - no question of principle Fair Trading Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED : Local Government Act 1919 Supreme Court Act 1970 Azzopardi v R [2001] HCA 25; (2001) 75 ALJR 931; (2001) 205 CLR 50 Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63; (1774) 98 ER 969 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 CASES CITED : Herron v McGregor and Others; Gill v McGregor and Others (1986) 6 NSWLR 246 Jones v Dunkel and Another (1959) 101 CLR 298 Perre and Others v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180 Watson v Foxman and Others; Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Foxman Holdings Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed and Others (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Neville John Shalhoub - First Plaintiff PARTIES : Lorna Rose Shalhoub - Second Plaintiff John Buchanan - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20145/02 COUNSEL : G Melick SC; E White - Plaintiffs M Joseph SC; R O'Keefe - Defendant SOLICITORS : Firmstone Lawyers - Plaintiffs Phillips Fox - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION COMMON LAW LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate