NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
Erlinda van den Braak v John Graham Chegwidden [2005] NSWSC 669 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 08/06/05; 16/06/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 July 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Nicholas J
DECISION : Para 56
CATCHWORDS : Inferior Courts - Local Court - civil claim - appeal - jurisdiction - whether jurisdiction to order claim to determination by arbitrator - whether registrar's order a procedural irregularity - whether arbitrator without jurisdiction - whether judgment should be set aside
Arbitration (Civil Actions) Act 1983; s 3(1); s 7(1); s 7(1A); s 18 LEGISLATION CITED : Local Courts (Civil Claims) Act 1970; s 6(2); s 19(1); s 21H(1); s 21H(3)(d); s 21H(5); s 69(2); s 69(4)(a); s 75A Local Courts (Civil Claims) Rules 1988; Pt 33, r 1(2)(j); Pt 33, r 9; Pt 38, r 2(d); Pt 38, r 11(b); Pt 38, r 12
Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Hoskins v van den Braak (1998) 43 NSWLR 290 CASES CITED : Minister for Immigration v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378
Erlinda van den Braak - Plaintiff PARTIES : John Graham Chegwidden - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2092/05
R W Killalea - Plaintiff COUNSEL : R Lovas - Defendant
Mendika Law Pty Ltd - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Chegwidden Solicitors - Defendant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate