NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 56 ACSR 126
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lets We Forget Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation & Ors [2005] NSWSC 1165
HEARING DATE(S) : 11/11/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 November 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed
CATCHWORDS : MORTGAGES - remedies of mortgagee - appointment by mortgagee of agents - mortgagee purports to appoint "as mortgagee in possession" - whether actions of mortgagee through agents and actions of agents should be enjoined if mortgagee not in truth "in possession" - ability of mortgagee to make new appointment at any time - no utility in order sought
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Part 5A.1, ss.9, 430 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990
CAI v Westpac Banking Corporation [2005] VSC 317 CASES CITED : New Brunswick and Canada Railway and Land Co v Muggeridge (1859) 4 Drew 686; 62 ER 263 Park v Brady [1976] 2 NSWLR 329
Lets We Forget Pty Ltd - Plaintiff Westpac Banking Corporation - First Defendant PARTIES : Stephen James Parbery - Second Defendant Mark Julian Robinson - Third Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5402/05
Mr R.R.I. Harper SC - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr P.J. Dowdy - Defendants
Sage Solicitors & Accountants - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Henry Davis York - Defendants
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
MONDAY 14 NOVEMBER 2005
5402/05 LETS WE FORGET PTY LIMITED v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION AND ORS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate