NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ASIC v MICHALIK [2004] NSWSC 966 revised - 02/11/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 15/10/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 October 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Corporations List JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Access granted to two affidavits as sought but with certain names masked and without exhibits and annexures
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - access to content of court file - application by journalist for access - need to strike balance among competing public interests LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules, Part 65 rule 7 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Michalik [2004] NSWSC 909 Hammond v Scheinberg (2001) 52 NSWLR 49 CASES CITED : Jagelman v Sheahan (as liquidator of Moage Ltd) (2002) 41 ACSR 487 Re Pan Pharmaceuticals Ltd (2003) 176 FLR 341 Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 Australian Securities and Investments Commission - Plaintiff Andrzej Janusz Michalik also known as Andre Tomaszewski and Stanislaw Konstanty Krawczyk - First Defendant PARTIES : Martin Michalik - Second Defendant Kilahim Pty Ltd - Third Defendant Vanda Carson - Applicant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4434/04 Mr D R Stack - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr B Slowgrove - Defendants Applicant in person Australian Securities and Investments Commission - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Dennis & Company - Defendants Applicant in person
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate