NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bell v Eldridge & Ors [2005] NSWSC 58
HEARING DATE(S) : 17.12.2004
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 February 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Berecry at 1
DECISION : See paragraph 64
CATCHWORDS : Strike out - Summary dismissal - Specific performance - Trust - Estoppel - Unconscionable conduct - Conversion - Detinue - Bailment - Arguable case - Real questions to be determined - Whether pleading oppressive and embarrassing - Elements of claim - Whether made out - Winding up - Standing to bring proceedings
LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules
General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Philip Morris v Brown (1980) 33 ALR 475 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioner (1949) 78 CLR 62 Webster v Lampard (1993) 116 ALR 545 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio 46 ALR 402 Bomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 CASES CITED : Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 Walton Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Penfolds Wines Pty Ltd v Elliott (1946) 74 CLR 204 Re Dernacourt Investments Pty Ltd 1990 20 NSWLR 588 John Start (Real Estate) Pty Ltd v Robert R Andrew (Aust Asia) Pty Ltd (1991) 6 ACSR 63
Kathleen Ann Bell Raymond Eldridge Florenville Pty Ltd PARTIES : Glen Eldridge Timothy Eldridge Anthony Eldridge
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate