NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Gardner [2005] NSWCCA 383
HEARING DATE(S): 28/09/2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Hislop J at 2; Rothman J at 24
DECISION: (1) Leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Sentencing - Rehabilitation - Sentence not suspended - Sentencing Judge's discretion - No error.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 - s 112(1)
Mallet v Mallet (1983–1984) 156 CLR 605 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 215 ALR 213 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 R v MA (2004) 145 A Crim R 434 CASES CITED: R v Molina (1984) 13 A Crim R 76 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Tait (1979) 46 FLR 386 R v Togias (2001) 127 A Crim R 23 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17
Bronwyn Margaret Gardner - Applicant PARTIES: Regina - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1573
Ms G Bashir - Applicant COUNSEL: Mr G Rowling - Respondent
SE O'Connor (Legal Aid Commission of NSW) - Applicant SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh (Director of Public Prosecutions) - Respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/21/0228
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Robison DCJ
- 1 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/1573
McCLELLAN CJ at CL HISLOP J ROTHMAN J
10 November 2005 R v GARDNER Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate