NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 143 LGERA 192
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: RTA v Muir Properties Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 460
HEARING DATE(S): 23 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 1; McColl JA at 124; Hunt AJA at 125
DECISION: (a) Appeal allowed; (b) Cross-appeal allowed; (c) Set aside so much of the orders made by Bignold J on 9 November 2004 as determined that the injurious affection to the respondent's retained land was the sum of $3,000,000; (d) The respondent's claim for compensation for injurious affection under s55(f) of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 with respect to the whole of the 6.177 hectares retained by it after the acquisition by the appellant of Lot 2 in DP 1043755 and Lots 18, 19, 26 and 27 in DP 1031575 be remitted to the Land and Environment Court for redetermination in accordance with these reasons for judgment; (e) Each party to pay its own costs of the appeal and cross-appeal
CATCHWORDS: ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – Compulsory acquisition of land – Compensation for injurious affection – Acquisition of road frontage land – Proposed transitway with no access from retained land to main road – "Before" and "after" valuation exercise – Appropriate discount for risk – Whether Point Gourde principle applied to determination of injurious affection – Affect to underlying zoning of retained land – Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991 s 55(f)
Baulkham Hills Local Environmental Plan 1991 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Interpretation Act 1987 Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court 1979 Local Government Act 1919 Roads Act 1993 State Roads Act 1986
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate