NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
EUI Pty Limited v Pamela Connell & ors [2005] NSWSC 1158 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 14 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
CATCHWORDS : INJUNCTIONS – Interlocutory injunctions – reconsideration and variation – where appropriate – where fresh evidence produced which could have been obtained for previous hearing on matters which were agitated in previous hearing
LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 1.11(3)
Adam P Brown Male Fashions Limited v Phillip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 at 178 Elders Rural Finance v Westpac (NSWSC, 24 May 1989, unreported) CASES CITED : EUI Pty Limited v Pamela Connell & Ors (NSWSC, 15 August, 2005, unreported) EUI Pty Limited v Pamela Connell & Ors (NSWSC, 16 August, 2005, unreported) Harrison Partners Constructions Pty Limited v Jevena Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC
EUI Pty Limited (plaintiff) Pamela Connell (first defendant) Mary Jane Nieuwenhuise (second defendant) PARTIES : Michael Nieuwenhuise (third defendant) Cornell Pastyoral Coy Pty Limited (fourth defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2306/04
J Hewitt (plaintiff) COUNSEL : A Seward (first, second, third defendants)
Clinch Neville Long (plaintiff) SOLICITORS : PME Robinson & Co (first, second, third defendants) Horton Rhodes (fourth defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate