NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hoobin v Hoobin [2004] NSWSC 705 HEARING DATE(S) : 21/06/04, 22/06/04, 23/06/04, 24/06/04, 25/06/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : White J DECISION : See paras 165-167.
CATCHWORDS : Probate - Whether will made in contemplation of marriage. - Family Provision Act - Extension of time for the making of application under s 7 - Inadequate provision on intestacy - Bladwell v Davis applied. - Wills, Probate & Administration - Orders to be made depending on whether plaintiff exercises her election under s 61D - Designation of matrimonial home after s 61D election as notional estate. Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Supreme Court Rules Pt 78 r 61 Marston v Roe de Fox and Halton (1838) 8 Ad & E 14; 112 ER 742 Layer v Burns Philp Trustee Co. Ltd (1986) 6 NSWLR 60 Burton v McGregor [1953] NZLR 487 Public Trustee v Crawley [1973] 1 NZLR 695 Keong v Keong [1973] QdR 516 In the estate of Gray, deceased (1963) 107 SJ 156 re Taylor deceased (1949) VLR 201 re Hamilton deceased [1941] VLR 60 Burton v McGregor [1953] NZLR 487 Smallacombe v Elder's Trustee & Executor Co. Ltd [1963] WAR 3 Dufficy v Mollica [1968] 3 NSWR 751 Conway v Wade [1909] AC 506 NSW Law Reform Commission, Report No. 47 "Community Law Reform Program: Wills - Execution and Revocation" CASES CITED : Sallis v Jones [1936] P 43 Leue v Reynolds (1986) 4 NSWLR 590 Warren v McKnight (1996) 40 NSWLR 390 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9 Singer v Berghouse (No. 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Luciano v Rosenblum [1985] 2 NSWLR 65 Bladwell v Davis [2004] NSWCA 170 Re Seery & Testator's Family Maintenance Act (1969) 90 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 400 Kleinig v Neal [1981] 1 NSWLR 462 Cantrell v Williams [2004] NSWSC 579 Hodges (dec'd), Re Estate of; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698 Re Bardon v Florence; Shekelton v Bardon (15/12/1983 SCNSW unreported) Giunti v Cavallaro [2004] NSWCA 62 Moore v Moore [2004] NSWSC 587 Margaret Rae Hoobin v Tina Louise Hoobin & 4 Ors PARTIES : Tina Louise Hoobin & 4 Ors v Margaret Rae Hoobin Margaret Rae Hoobin v Tina Louise Hoobin & 4 Ors FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 114192/02; 1230/03; 2009/02 COUNSEL : Plaintiff: Mrs M Bridger Defendant: Mrs M Gilmour SOLICITORS : Plaintiff: O'Neill's Solicitors Defendants: Budd & Piper
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate