Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
New South Wales
Supreme Court
CITATION : Fazzalori v Schermer [2004] NSWSC 931
HEARING DATE(S) : 7 October 2004
JUDGMENT DATE :
7 October 2004
JURISDICTION:
Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : Question of entitlement to balance of proceeds of sale of a property sold under order of the Court referred to Master for inquiry.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY [424] - Equitable remedies - Accounts and inquiries - Other cases - Inquiry - Question of entitlement to balance of proceeds of sale of a property sold under order of the Court.
PARTIES : Vivie Anne Fazzalori (P)
Gerhard Joseph Schermer (D)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 6141/01
COUNSEL : M Meyer, Solicitor (P)
In person (D)
SOLICITORS : Meyer Pigdon (P)
In person (D)
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
EQUITY DIVISION
HAMILTON J
THURSDAY, 7 OCTOBER 2004
6141/01 VIVIE ANNE FAZZALORI v GERHARD JOSEPH SCHERMER
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: While a number of matters have been able to be agreed between the parties to these proceedings, they have not been able to agree as to the amounts in which they are respectively entitled to $39,770 held in the trust account of David H Cohen & Co, the former solicitors for the defendant, as noted in the Court's orders made on 30 April 2004. The disputes, as I understand it, relate to the incidence of various costs of the sale of a property, which took place under order of the Court and of which the $39,770 forms the balance of the proceeds. I have since that time on a number of occasions encouraged the parties to settle their differences as to this matter or to devise, by agreement, some simplified method, for example, by the report of an agreed accountant, by which the question could be settled.
2 Those things have simply not occurred. I have contemplated ordering the payment out of the funds in the proportion of 60:40, which was the proportion in which the parties held the equity in the property, leaving the parties to pursue any claims they have against each other in a Court of appropriate jurisdiction, probably the Local Court. However, as the moneys are held under a restraint of this Court and as the outstanding question is a question as to the expenses of a sale conducted under order of the Court, I do not think that that is an appropriate course to follow.
3 The determination of this question certainly does not merit the expenditure of Judge time, nor is this a matter which would have been dealt with by a Judge under the traditional procedures of the Equity Court. I have tried to avoid the committal of the matter to the somewhat formal and expensive process of an inquiry before the Master but, in the absence of any ability of the parties to agree, this appears to me to be the only course open. That would leave the only question to be determined by a Judge to be the question of what should be done about the costs of the proceedings. I shall stand that question over to be dealt with by me after the inquiry before the Master.
4 The orders that I make as are as follows:
1 That it be referred to the Master to inquire as to the respective entitlement of the parties to the sum of $39,770 held in the trust account of David H Cohen & Co solicitors as noted in the Court's order made on 30 April 2004 being part of the proceeds of sale of 13 Belmore Street, Surry Hills under order of the Court.
2 That order 1 be entered forthwith.
3 That PO Box K726 Haymarket 1240 be taken to be the defendant's address for service pending his filing a notice of address for service.
4 The proceedings are stood over to 9 March 2005 at 9.30am before me for directions as to argument concerning costs.
5 Liberty to restore on two days notice.
**********
Last Modified: 12/14/2004
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.