NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2005) Aust Torts Reports 81-815
New South Wales Court of Appeal
Consolidated Broken Hill Ltd v Edwards [2005] NSWCA 380 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 02/11/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Hunt AJA at 77
DECISION: The Appeal is upheld, verdict and judgment set aside and in lieu thereof there will be verdict and judgment for Mr Edwards in the sum of $912,915. Mr Edwards is to pay the costs of the appeal and is allowed a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act 1951 (NSW) if otherwise qualified.
CATCHWORDS: NEGLIGENCE-- occupier's liability -- occupier of private land -- duty of care to trespassers it allowed to pass over its land -- approach to risks -- relevance to breach of duty -- whether reasonable response by occupier to obviousness of risk. - NEGLIGENCE -- contributory negligence -- where deliberate and voluntary decision to undertake obvious and serious risk -- relevance of personal responsibility in apportionment of liability -- plaintiff's duty to take care for own safety. - Section 5R of Civil Liability Act.
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
Australian Safeways Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR Phillis v Daly (1998) 15 NSWLR Romeo v Conservation Commission of Northern Territory (1998) 192 CLR 431 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62 CASES CITED: Mulligan v Coffs Harbour City Council {2005} HCA 63 Thompson v Woolworths (Queensland) Pty Ltd (2005) 79 ALJR 904 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council (2005) 79 ALJR 565 Woods v Multi-Sport Holding Pty Ltd (2002) 208 CLR 460 Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council (2001) 206 CLR 512 Wyong Shire Council v Vairy; Mulligan v Coff's Harbour City Council [2004] NSWCA 247
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate