NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Caplice v Aroogah Investments Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 287
HEARING DATE(S) : 04/04/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 4 April 2005
Equity Division JURISDICTION : Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Order that winding up proceedings be tried at the same time as Property (Relationships) Act proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - winding up application by one of two shareholders, directors and creditors of company - concurrent Property (Relationships) Act proceedings between the same persons - whether both should be tried together - FAMILY LAW - de facto relationships - need for all financial relationships between parties to be determined in Property (Relationships) Act proceedings
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss.461(1), LEGISLATION CITED : Property (Relationships) Act 1984, ss.19, 20
Caplice v Aroogah Investments Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 516 Fox Enterprises Pty Limited v Fox (1995) 123 FLR 445 Mattock v Mattock (1989) 97 FLR 112 CASES CITED : Mourd v Atlantis Nominees Pty Ltd (1990) 100 FLR 478 Roff v Aqua Distributors Pty Ltd (1996) 22 ACSR 248 Vitali v Stachnik (2001) 28 Fam LR 142 Zhu v Tech Universal (HK-Macau) Development Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 256
Andrea Caplice - Plaintiff PARTIES : Aroogah Investments Pty Limited - First Defendant Richard Garth Carey - Second Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2802/04
Mr V.A. Bizannes, Solicitor - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr D.M. Flaherty - Second Defendant
Bizannes & Associates - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Cameron Gillingham Boyd - Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate