NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 152 A Crim R 405 62 NSWLR 481
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Lois Williams [2005] NSWCCA 100
HEARING DATE(S): 29 October 2004
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 March 2005
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan AJA at 1; Adams J at 2; Smart AJ at 3
DECISION: See paragraph 85
CATCHWORDS: Condition as to total abstention from alcohol is a condition relating to treatment and should not be imposed as a matter of course - need for Court to comply with cl 6 of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Regulation 1999 - effect of termination of supervision component of bond by Probation and Parole Service
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 19099 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2001 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) (Periodic Detention, Home Detention, Community Service Work and Parole) Regulation 1995.
R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 CASES CITED: R v Leete 125 A Crim R 37
PARTIES: Regina v Lois Williams
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/1833
(A) S Corish COUNSEL: (C) B Knox SC
(A) M Schneider SOLICITORS: (C) S Kavanagh
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 01/41/0039
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Twigg DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 04/1833
McCLELLAN AJA ADAMS J SMART AJ Thursday, 24 March 2005 Regina v Lois WILLIAMS Judgment
1. McCLELLAN AJA: I agree with Smart AJ.
2. ADAMS J: I agree with the orders proposed by Smart AJ and with his Honour's reasons.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate