NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Chapman v. Taylor & Ors; Vero Insurance Ltd. v. Taylor & Ors [2005] NSWCA 11
HEARING DATE(S): Matter dealt with on written submissions in Chambers
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Tobias JA at 10
DECISION: In addition to the orders made in par.[45] of the judgment dated 13 December 2004, the following order made: 4. Mr. and Mrs. Taylor to pay Vero's costs of the appeal not extending to briefing senior counsel, and to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act if otherwise eligible.
CATCHWORDS: COSTS - Appeal - Two parties with substantially similar interests - Separate appeals brought - One appellant, an insurer with an interest in establishing a general point, briefed senior counsel - Respondent ordered to pay the appellant's costs, not extending to briefing senior counsel.
David Neil Chapman - appellant Ernest & Fredericka Taylor - 1st respondents PARTIES: Vero Insurance Ltd - 2nd respondent Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal - 3rd respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40120/04; 41106/03
COUNSEL: The relevant parties filed written submissions
G.P. Bartels, Eastwood for 1st respondent SOLICITORS: McLachlan Chilton, Sydney for 2nd respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Common Law Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC12971/02
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Master Harrison
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40120/04 CA 41106/03 SC 12971/02 CTTT No.HB 00/83497
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate