NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2005) Aust Torts Reports 81-814
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Forstaff Blacktown Pty Limited v Brimac Pty Limited & Anor; Brimac Pty Ltd v Johnston & Anor [2005] NSWCA 423
HEARING DATE(S): 14 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Ipp JA at 6; McColl JA at 7
DECISION: The liability appeal and the cross appeal :; (1) Appeal and cross-appeal allowed (2) Notice of cross-appeal to be filed within 7 days (3) Set aside the verdict and judgment entered by Delaney DCJ on 4 March 2005 against the appellant in favour of the respondent (4 )Verdict and judgment for the respondent in the sum of $191,471.54 (5) Respondent to pay 20% of Brimac's costs of the appeal but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if otherwise qualified.; The contribution appeal:; (6) Grant leave to appeal (7 )Notice of Appeal to be filed within 7 days (8) Appeal allowed (9) Verdict and judgment on the cross-claim set aside and in lieu thereof verdict and judgment for the appellant on the cross-claim ; (10) Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the contribution appeal and the appellant's costs of the cross-claim in the District Court.
CATCHWORDS: TORT - negligence - duty of care – experienced worker contracted to third party by labour hire firm – whether breach of duty – Contributory negligence – whether worker's conduct amounted to a departure from the standard of care of a reasonable man. - CONTRIBUTION - joint or several tortfeasors - third party and employer of injured worker - amendments to Workers Compensation Act 1987 limiting damages recoverable from employer - injury before amendments – worker's proceedings brought against third party after amendments – third party cross-claims against employer of injured worker seeking to recover contribution – injured worker unable to recover damages against employer - whether contribution pursuant to s 5(1)(c) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 available - whether s 151Z(2) of Workers Compensation Act precludes contribution (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate