NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Pollock [2005] NSWCCA 316
HEARING DATE(S): 3 August 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Howie J at 83; Rothman J at 84
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: murder conviction 1990 - application for review of conviction - Crimes Act 1901, Part 13A - whole case referred to Court of Criminal Appeal - to be dealt with as an appeal under Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - evidence of admission by appellant given by police officer in trial - denied by appellant - appellant alleged confessional evidence fabricated - appellant alleged participation in interview not voluntary - admissibility of confessional material - other uncontested evidence of admissions by appellant - fresh evidence - evidence given to the Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service - credibility of police witnesses at trial - police officer charged with refusing to submit to breath analysis, proved but dismissed - whether capable of affecting credibility of police officer at trial - police officer alleged to have taken part in assault - whether capable of affecting credibility - alleged inadequate or corrupt investigation of different murder - whether capable of affecting credibility - whether fresh evidence meets established tests - impact of Evidence Act 1995 on admission of evidence relevant only to credibility - no doubt or disquiet about conviction - appeal dismissed
Crimes Act 1900 s6, s474E(1)(b), s474L, s556A LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s6 Evidence Act 1995 Part 3.7, s102, s103
Gallagher v The Queen [1986] HCA 26; 160 CLR 392 Mickelberg v The Queen [1989] HCA 35; 167 CLR 259 Nye v State of NSW & Ors [2003] NSWSC 1212 CASES CITED: R v Pearson NSWCCA, unreported, 5 March 1996 R v Pollitt [1992] HCA 35; 174 CLR 558 R v Robinson [1999] NSWCCA 186, unreported, 14 July 1999 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate