NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Burke v State of New South Wales & Ors [2004] NSWSC 725 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 November 2003, 24 March 2004, 9 August 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 September 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass at 1 DECISION : The notice of motion is dismissed; the plaintiff is to pay the costs of the notice of motion; the exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Extension of limitation period - pure mental harm - statutory prohibition to recovery of damages - plaintiff must have witnessed victim at the scene being killed, injured or put in peril - meaning of statutory terminology - delay and explanation for delay - conscious decision not to sue - prejudice and fair trial unlikely. LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002, Pt 3 s28, s30, s30(1), s30(2)(a) Limitation Act 1969, s60C, s60E CASES CITED : Itek Graphix Pty Ltd v Elliot [2002] NSWCA 104 Tame v State of New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Limited [2002] HCA 35 Anthony John Burke (Plaintiff) PARTIES : State of New South Wales (First Defendant) Roads & Traffic Authority (Second Defendant) Lend Lease Corporation (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20509/02 COUNSEL : Ms S Norton SC, Ms A Healey (Plaintiff) Mr P Garling SC, Ms C Webster (Defendants) Stacks - the Law Firm (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Frances Allpress (First and Second Defendants) Freehills (Third Defendant)
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate