NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Rinne v Director-General of DET [2005] NSWSC 261
HEARING DATE(S) : 29 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 1 April 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
DECISION : (1) The plaintiff's amended statement of claim filed 25 January 2005 is dismissed; (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Dismiss Amended Statement of Claim
Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) - s 42D(2) LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Part 13 r 5; Part 15 r 26
Air Services Australia v Zarb (NSWCA unreported, 26 August 1998) Dey v Victoria Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 CASES CITED : General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 Webster & Anor v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598
Jarmo Rinne (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Director-General Department of Education and Training (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20208/2004
Mr S Flanigan COUNSEL : (Defendant)
Mr J Rinne (Plaintiff in person)
Mr D McVey SOLICITORS : Department of Education and Training (Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
MASTER HARRISON
FRIDAY, 1 APRIL 2005
20208/2004 - JARMO RINNE v DIRECTOR-GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
JUDGMENT (Dismiss Amended Statement of Claim) 1 MASTER: The defendant by notice of motion filed 1 February 2005, seeks to have the plaintiff's amended statement of claim either struck out in whole or in part or dismissed. The defendant relied on two affidavits of Daniel McVey sworn 8 September 2004 and 17 February 2005. The plaintiff relied on a bundle of documents "Ex A" and sought to revive his notice of motion to strike out the defendant's notice of motion. 2 Previously, on 8 September 2004, the defendant had filed an identical notice of motion seeking to dismiss the statement of claim. On 15 November 2004 Assistant Deputy Registrar Howe made an order striking out the statement of claim and granted leave to the plaintiff to file an amended statement of claim (ASC) by 28 January 2005. On 25 January 2005 the plaintiff filed an ASC.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate