NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 152 A Crim R 302
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Peter Buchanan, Justin Robert Smith and Trevor Thomas [2004] NSWSC 816 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/08/2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Buddin J DECISION : Application to exclude identification evidence refused.
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 Papakosmas v R (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 CASES CITED : R v Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 326 R v Carusi (1997) 92 A Crim R 52 R v Ford (NSWSC unreported 22/4/98) R v Jamal (2000) 116 A Crim R 45 R v Leroy and Graham [2000] NSWCCA 302 R v Tugaga (1994) 74 A Crim R 190 Regina PARTIES : Peter Buchanan Justin Robert James Smith Trevor Anthony Thomas FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70054/03; 70235/03; 70236/03 B Smith (Crown) COUNSEL : M Ramage QC (Buchanan) J Chicken (Smith) G Turnbull (Thomas) SE O'Connor (Crown) SOLICITORS : John Krajcik (Buchanan) Andrew Harris & Associates (Smith) Adamson Solicitors (Thomas)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
BUDDIN J
TUESDAY 10 AUGUST 2004
70054/03 – REGINA v PETER BUCHANAN 70235/03 – REGINA v JUSTIN ROBERT JAMES SMITH 70236/03 – REGINA v TREVOR ANTHONY THOMAS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate