NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Goodrich Aerospace Pty Limited v Arsic (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 119
HEARING DATE(S): On written submissions
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 August 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Tobias JA at 10
DECISION: (1) Order (4) of the orders made on 18 July 2006 be amended by adding the following words to the order in question: " save to the extent of any interlocutory costs orders" (2) Otherwise the orders proposed stand (3) The respondent to pay the costs of the argument in relation to the issue of costs.
PARTIES: Goodrich Aerospace Pty Limited (Appellant) Dusan Arsic (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40821/05
COUNSEL: J E Maconachie QC/D P Kelly (Appellant) B M J Toomey QC/D J Hooke (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Cutler Hughes & Harris (Appellant) Beilby Poulden Costello (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 1445/04
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Ainslie-Wallace DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 07/09/05
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40821/05 DC 1445/04
MASON P IPP JA TOBIAS JA
Wednesday 16 August 2006 GOODRICH AEROSPACE PTY LIMITED v DUSAN ARSIC (No 2) Judgment (On Costs) 1 MASON P: I agree with Ipp JA. 2 IPP JA: In my judgment delivered on 18 July 2006 I proposed the following orders:
(1) The orders made by Ainslie-Wallace DCJ are set aside.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate